Daily Stormer |
- Stormer Poll: Who do You Think did Jew Boris?
- Joe Rogan Calls Out Male SJW Faggots
- Holder Calls for a Lower Standard of Proof for Civil Rights Violations
- Ron Paul Warns the People That ZOG is Trying to Clamp Our Tubes
- Family of “Scottish” ISIS Bride in Tears Their Innocent Teen Embarked on Desert CockQuest
- Portugal: Leftists Demand “Racism be Made a Crime”
- UK: Rats Successful in Stopping Park from Being Jokingly Named “Hitler’s Walk”
- CNN: Australian Muslim Fights Twitter ‘Troll Army’
- LOL: Syriza Negotiates Worse Deal Than Samaras!
- Poll: UKIP Trusted on Immigration But Viewed as “Racist”
| Stormer Poll: Who do You Think did Jew Boris? Posted: 28 Feb 2015 10:16 AM PST Andrew Anglin  Dead Jew Boris Nemtsov Following the death of Jew Boris, the leader of the Russian opposition party standing against Czar Vladimir I, many different theories are being forwarded. So, I am interested to see the readers personal leanings. I am not asking you to give some official speculation, simply to say which option you find to be the most likely. Here are the most likely perpetrators: 1.) The West  “The West” as a collective of Jews and Jew puppets, appears to have the most to gain from this killing. The obvious explanation, when you hear that Boris had been saying he was going to be killed by Putin, is that the West did it for the purpose of demonizing Putin. This is probably the most likely perpetrator. Either the CIA or the Mossad took him out. They were rather clearly responsible for the shootings at the Maidan that resulted in the overthrow of Yanokovich. Though in this case, they aren’t going to be turning the people against Putin by killing his enemy, as I’m sure most Russians feel like I do: if Putin did it, he did it for the sake of Russia. The one thing that makes me question this most likely of perpetrators is that Boris was a Jew, and Jews generally will not harm another Jew. There are some historical cases of Jews killing other Jews to forward a Jew agenda, but they are very rare and in some of these cases I think the Jew deaths may have been faked (King David Hotel). Please note that the Jews were literally calling up Jews before 9/11 and telling them not to go into work that day. These weren’t big Jews, just normal old Jews, and they risked giving away their involvement in the attack to ensure they lived. 2.) Putin Himself  Has this meme been true all along? The Jew media position is that Putin ordered the hit himself. This does not make clear political sense, as Boris did not represent a significant opposition politically. It would, however, send a message to the West and in particular the Jews that he is not playing a game. On some level, it also makes him seem more romantic and capable in the minds of the European right (and Europeans in general, on a subconscious level at least), who understand that it is going to take a man with strength beyond anything we currently see in European politics to fix the problems we are dealing with, in particular the immigration issue. Putin is presently in the process of solidifying ties with the “far-right” or Europe. I don’t think this probably makes much sense, but I think everyone who reads this site respects a political leader willing to destroy his enemies. It could also be seen as a message to the West, and in particular the Jews, given that they continue to push against him. But again, Putin seems to have more to lose than benefit from this, in my opinion. Even Boris’ own allies are saying it is unlikely the Kremlin ordered it, even while the Jew media lays blame on Putin personally. 3.) Russian Patriots Acting of Their Own Accord  Russia is a rough place, and Putin has a whole lot of support among all strata of society. Many Russians I have personally known have a violent streak, and people are constantly getting killed in Moscow. It isn’t particularly unlikely that a Russian patriot, who viewed the filthy Jew Boris as a danger to his country, acted of his own accord and took him out. This is in many ways more likely than the first two options. 4.) The Maidan  Despite coaching from John Kerry and other American Jews, the Jews who run the Maidan have proved themselves to be total loose cannon whackjobs. It appears that the Maidan did Malaysian Jet without permission from the higher authorities in the West – that is, they set up their own false flag, shooting down the plane to blame Putin, without the oversight of CIA or Mossad. That is my assumption at least, given how sloppy it was. It was also very bold. The same level of boldness that this Boris killing entailed. With this, there is the same issue that I don’t really see Jews killing other Jews, and the Maidan is completely run by Jews. 5.) “Other”  Some are going so far as to claim Moslem terrorists might have done it. The above listed are in my view the four most likely options, but as there are other possibilities, I will leave an “other” option. The Telegraph has published a piece saying that it could have been Moslem terrorists or angry business associates (he was a Jew, so you know he pissed off some business associates). If you answer “other,” you can explain in the comments. |
| Joe Rogan Calls Out Male SJW Faggots Posted: 28 Feb 2015 08:45 AM PST Daily Stormer A new Zeitgeist is rising across the internet. 4chan was the first to go hardcore, but recently, the manosphere, the libertarians, the Alex Jones conspiracy theorists, and on and on are becoming aware that there is an agenda against White people. Here is Joe Rogan, who is typically pretty liberal, calling out faggot SJW males. Note: Clip contains a lot of profanity. He is representative of a pretty significant portion of internet culture, and this is definitely a step in the right direction. |
| Holder Calls for a Lower Standard of Proof for Civil Rights Violations Posted: 28 Feb 2015 08:38 AM PST Steve Sailer  “My people…” From Politico:
Holder could look outside the mainstream of Anglo-Saxon jurisprudence to more informal community-based systems of legal reasoning, such as lynch law.
They could call it Lynch law.
For example, consider the old rationalization for punishing an innocent man: For Reason of State. Isn't it about time that the Obama Administration becomes entitled to arbitrarily imprison cisgender straight white males For Reason of Narrative?
Guilty by reason of uppitiness!
If security camera footage shows the convenience store was looted by at least twelve good men and true, that should constitute a legal indictment of any white cop under federal civil rights laws.
Trial by Twitter would be one reform that deserves serious consideration.
You can't get much more disinterested than the Obama Administration over Trayvon in the run-up to the 2012 Election: "You know, when Trayvon Martin was first shot I said that this could have been my son. Another way of saying that is Trayvon Martin could have been me 35 years ago."
For example, if a random white person in the metropolitan area gets beaten to death with hammers within a few weeks of a white cop being let off by the judicial system, that show of community concern should legally override the white man's outmoded Constitutional immunity from double jeopardy.
For example, the federal government could prosecute white people based on a sophisticated metric consisting of a case's column inches of coverage in the New York Times multiplied by the number of miles from the New York Times Building on 8th Avenue.
For example, indicting people based on Facebook Likes and Dislikes would be a disruptive approach to the hidebound judicial system.
Another reform would be to remove pedantic pre-postmodern technicalities about the white malefactor needing to actually "exist," thus allowing the Obama Administration the moral satisfaction of indicting Haven Monahan. |
| Ron Paul Warns the People That ZOG is Trying to Clamp Our Tubes Posted: 28 Feb 2015 08:22 AM PST Daily Stormer  The Tubocaust: Ron Paul says it’s happening. And he knows a thing or two about happenings. Ron Paul, despite his libertarian political and economic claptrap, has always been a defender of the freedom of the people. He has also been a generally sharp cat. Yesterday, he warned us of a coming clampdown on the internet. He posted this on his Facebook Page:
This I agree with completely. The Jew Soros has been a big backer of this clampdown, and the Negro terrorist chief of America has endorsed it. If this were to go through, sites such as the Daily Stormer would no longer be allowed to broadcast their truth to the masses. As such, it would not be necessary to technically suspend the First Amendment, because they would be making it impossible for us to exercise it on any type of scale.
Though it seems like a far-off if not impossible occurrence, it is very important to understand that it is a goal of the Jew rulership to remove our internet rights. |
| Family of “Scottish” ISIS Bride in Tears Their Innocent Teen Embarked on Desert CockQuest Posted: 28 Feb 2015 07:55 AM PST Daily Stormer This is a video from last year of CNN interviewing the parents of a “Scottish” girl who embarked on Desert CockQuest. Just look at how they paint this girl as some sort of victim. It’s the same thing they are going with the three recent “British” seekers of terror-penis. What utter gibberish it is. These girls must have seen the videos of ISIS chopping heads and crucifying people, or they wouldn’t even know what ISIS is, but someone their desire to go get laid by them is the fault of Western society, and a responsibility we are supposed to take on ourselves to deal with. This in itself demonstrates just how ridiculous modern cultural Marxism is. Even the sexual escapades of brown girls are somehow Whitey’s fault. |
| Portugal: Leftists Demand “Racism be Made a Crime” Posted: 28 Feb 2015 07:26 AM PST Daily Stormer  These colorfuls must be protected. It is the most important thing ever in history. Leftists in Portugal are demanding that “racism” become a criminal offense in the country, a measure which they claim will help protect an invading army of hostile African parasites.
Although it is unclear exactly what they are asking for, it appears that by demanding “racism” be made a crime, they are attempting to legislate personal emotions, thoughts and beliefs in an Orwellian manner. Here is the definition of racism:
And here is the definition of thoughtcrime:
These liberals started out with “hate speech” legislation claiming they were protecting privileged minorities from violence. Now, they are dropping that pretext, and simply saying outright that they wish to control our very thoughts. |
| UK: Rats Successful in Stopping Park from Being Jokingly Named “Hitler’s Walk” Posted: 28 Feb 2015 07:16 AM PST Daily Stormer  The original sign, before being taken down in 2005: It is one of the worst things that has happened in modern British history. What these goyim failed to understand is that jokes about Hitler can not only lead to infinite hurt feelings, they can also lead to millions of Jews being turned into lampshades on purpose.
|
| CNN: Australian Muslim Fights Twitter ‘Troll Army’ Posted: 28 Feb 2015 07:05 AM PST Andrew Anglin  How does one propose to fight an army of troll? Though the Stormer Troll Army regularly gets mentions in mainstream media, CNN is the first to put our actual name – “Troll Army” – in a headline. Take a bow, Stormers. A grand spectacle thou hath created. Our operation was launched earlier this month in response to the arrest of an ethnically Australian woman who allegedly hurt Miriam’s feelings by saying something mean to her on the internet, something which few people knew about as the Jew media of Australia did not make it a focal point, did not invite the Australian people to discuss whether All of the mainstream media coverage we’ve received means that we have gotten the issue into the public light, and given the people of Australia the opportunity to think about whether or not hurting someone’s feelings on the internet should be an imprisonable offense. Given that the whole spectacle began with Miriam demanding a t-shirt which hurt her feelings be removed from shelves, we have also brought light to the fact that people who come to Australia from foreign lands for the purpose of “having a better life” (read: parasiting off the labor of generations of hard-working White Australians) believe they have the right not only to slaughter Australians in chocolate shops, but also to dictate what they wear. By pushing this into the light, we are also forcing Miriam and her allies to show just how viciously they will defend their right to rule over the Australian people. Bottom line: mission accomplished.  Late last year, one of Miriam’s Moslem fighting comrades stormed a chocolate shop, held hostages and began murdering people. This man and Miriam have the same agenda – to transform Australia into a Moslem country – they simply go about it in different ways. The article vilifies us, of course, and accuses us of making threats against Miriam Veiszadeh, even though these threats were obviously made by her against herself, as we expressly commanded no such threats be made. Of the thousands of insulting messages sent to the insolent Moslem invader, only three contained threats – but these are of course what is focused on. While mentioning our having instructed people not to make threats, they do not bother to mention our claims that she almost certainly sent the threats to herself. They also do not mention the utter idiocy of taking internet threats seriously, given that it isn’t exactly typical to send someone a warning on the internet before you come after them. “The reality is people don’t abuse me just because I’m a woman or because my name is Mariam or because I’m Middle-Eastern. They abuse me because I have a scarf on my head and because I’m a Muslim,” Veiszadeh told CNN. And this is partially true – the main issue is that she is attempting to force an alien value system on the people. But if she wasn’t of a foreign race, she wouldn’t be doing this. Australia saw a large number of Italians immigrate to the country decades ago, and none of them began demanding that Australians change their value system to make them feel comfortable – they were grateful for the opportunity they’d been given. This Moslem wench is the epitome of ungratefulness. This is where she came from:  Afghanistan Yet instead of being like “wow, thank you for bringing me out of one of the poorest countries in the world into your rich and developed nation,” she begins demanding that the entire society change to make her feel more comfortable. Before she demanded that a t-shirt she didn’t like be remove from shelves at Woolworth’s, she had launched a campaign to normalize the primitive and bizarre rag-head “hijab” fashion she is fond of. So she begins by saying “you as Australians must learn to accept the way I dress” before moving into “you Australians must change the way you dress in order to make me feel comfortable.”  The original t-shirt Tweeted demands the parasite made against the Australian people on Twitter.  A Tweet she made less than two weeks before, demanding that Australians respect her sick and weird fashion sensibilities. What is very interesting is that CNN frames this in terms of a “battle.” And a battle it is – a battle for public opinion. We are forcing a discussion. Do the Australian people think that a woman should be able to come to their country from a foreign land, start making decisions about what people are allowed to wear on their t-shirts, and then have people arrested for allegedly hurting her feelings on the internet? Before our operation, it was simply taken for granted that yes, hostile aliens should be able to enter the country and be given unlimited capacity to force their will upon the local population. Now, we are having a discussion about it. More victories on the horizon still, Stormers! Continue the fight! If you would like to see more mainstream news stories about your racist selves, please continue to flood Miriam’s Twitter page with unlimited insults. And once again – no threats of any kind, nothing which can even be construed as a threat. CNN claims we only tell people not to make threats because we don’t want to get arrested or have our site shut down by the government, but in reality, I am against illegal actions and I am opposed to violence. We simply support free speech, and believe that Australians have a right to make their own decisions about the way their country is run. Hail Victory. |
| LOL: Syriza Negotiates Worse Deal Than Samaras! Posted: 28 Feb 2015 06:07 AM PST Andrew Anglin  Don’t make that face, Alexis! No one feels bad for you! Syriza, who was voted in for the singular purpose that they were going to stand up to the EU, has not only failed to do so, but may in fact have “renegotiated” into a worse deal than the Samaras government! This must be laughed at. The entire deal was done in secret by the Minister of Finance, without the presence of advisers, making it rather clear that it was just a “show me the paper and I’ll sign it” situtaion. This literally means that Syriza is officially the worst shill party ever in the history of democracy! What’s more, the agreement they singed makes their own program illegal!
Greece is one of the only countries in the world with a real and hardcore nationalist group to vote for – a party which never would have sold out like this – and yet they voted for fake communists. Hopefully, they’ve finally learned their lesson!  The time has come! |
| Poll: UKIP Trusted on Immigration But Viewed as “Racist” Posted: 28 Feb 2015 05:10 AM PST Andrew Anglin  Final proof Nigel is the new Hitler. UKIP’s support base continues to expand, as their detractors begin to look more and more insane, accusing them of being hardcore Nazis for simply wanting to close the border. At the same time, the media drone that they are evil racists seems to be effecting the public mind. ITV:
This is why I have always said there is little point in pretending not to be racist – you are going to get accused of it even if you deny it. In fact, even if you don’t really feel it (yes, they are accusing you of holding a wrong emotion) you are going to be accused of it by the Jews if you say anything at all against the invasion.  Looking good. Being considered “nasty” by one half makes you that much more attractive to the other half. Still, from what I have seen of the British, they are extremely brainwashed on the racism issue (my recent conflict with Sargon of Akkad demonstrated this), much more so than Americans are, so probably the UKIP strategy is best. Also note on the poll numbers: invaders make up a good percentage of the population of the UK. Also, women still have the view of the current state, and if the state were to change hands, the vast majority of women would then change their position, meaning support would double. |
| You are subscribed to email updates from Daily Stormer To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
| Google Inc., 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, United States | |
No comments:
Post a Comment